Philip Yancey's featured book Where The Light Fell: A Memoir is available here: See purchase options!

Farewell to the Golden Age

by Philip Yancey

| 63 Comments

Campus Life coverI have lived through the golden age of publishing, first with magazines and then with books.  I began my career at Campus Life in 1971, and in ten years saw our circulation leap from 50,000 to 250,000.  Like many magazines, Campus Life eventually bit the dust as advertising dollars migrated to flashier (and cheaper) online sources and consumers no longer responded to direct mail offers and renewal letters.

For almost four decades (yikes!) I’ve worked as a freelance writer, feeling enormously blessed to make a good living by writing about issues of faith that I would want to explore even if no one bought my books.  Every year my royalties go down, though with more than 20 books in print I can still pay bills and find publishers willing to sponsor new books.

The changes in publishing, especially Christian publishing, stood out sharply to me when I stopped in at the largest annual Christian book convention in June.  At one time 15,000 attended that trade show, a convention so large that only a handful of cities could accommodate it.  Now less than 4,000 attend, and in Atlanta it occupied a corner of the huge convention center.  A couple hundred delegates attended a luncheon in which I participated on a panel with Ravi Zacharias and Ryan Dobson; ten years ago the same luncheon would have filled a thousand-seat banquet hall.  Though name authors had book signings, the only lines I saw were for two stars of Duck Dynasty.

Diane Stortz

Book publishing is going through massive changes.  Almost every month bookstore sales fall below the total from last year…and the year before.  Of the 5,000 Christian bookstores in the U.S. open in the 1970s, barely half that number have survived.  What happened?

In truth, many Christian bookstores were “mom and pop” stores run more out of a sense of ministry than business acumen.  Managers stocked too many titles, knew little about marketing, and stayed in business mainly because every so often a mega-seller like The Purpose Driven Life or the Left Behind series would come along to rescue their bottom line.  In the early 1990s chain stores such as Walmart, Costco, and Sam’s Club started picking off these bestsellers and general bookstores like Borders (now defunct) and Barnes & Noble greatly expanded their religion departments.  Then came Amazon.com, offering deep discounts to siphon off the steady sales that kept small bookstores afloat.

There was a cost to the industry, of course.  No longer Ebook apple and open old bookwould shoppers browse the shelves, pick up books to scan the contents, and walk out with five books when they had intended to buy just one.  Now they ordered the one they wanted online, untempted by new books they did not even know existed.  Scores of college and seminary bookstores closed as students ordered the required books online, forfeiting the ability to browse among unassigned books that also might interest them.

Christian bookstores adapted by expanding their product line.  Many Christian bookstores today realize less than 30 percent of their profits on books.  Instead they stock Precious Moments statues, greeting cards, toys, games, Thomas Kinkade prints, and religious kitsch.  People still like to finger gift items before they buy.

Ebook on pile of old booksIn the past five years the digital revolution has introduced a whole new challenge to the publishing industry, much like its impact on music and movies.  Until last year e-books were rising at double-digit rates.  For publishers and also authors (the “plankton” of the publishing food chain), this has meant a drastic reduction in income.  Say an author signs a contract to receive a 10 percent royalty on each book sold.  In the old days he or she would receive $2.50 on a $25 hardback book.  Now Amazon offers the book electronically for $9.99 and often offers specials of $2.99.  For the same amount of work, the author may receive half or even 10 percent as much as from “dead tree” publishing.

Last year publishers in the U.S. took in $15 billion in income from all sources.  E-books represented one-fourth of the sales volume but only 10 percent of the revenue, due to their lower prices.

For a first-time author, these are the best of times and the worst of times.  Thanks to advances in self-publishing, anyone can get a book in print—as long as you’re willing to bear the costs of production, marketing, and sales that used to be absorbed by publishers.  Brick-and-mortar bookstores generally won’t stock your book, so you have to find other ways to get the word out.  Good luck.

You can lower the cost by publishing in electronic format only, in which case you’ll need even more luck.  The best-selling author Tony Horwitz (Confederates in the Attic, Midnight Rising: John Brown and the Raid that Sparked the Civil War) recently wrote in the New York Times about his experience with electronic publishing.  He was delighted to find that his instant book on the Keystone pipeline, Boom, had landed in the Amazon Top 25 list of all digital titles—only to learn that he had sold a mere 800 copies.

I had an enlightening experience with e-books in 2013.  In April I finished the book The Question That Never Goes Away, based on my visits to three places of great tragedy.  My traditional publisher wanted at least nine months lead time to publish it, the typical schedule for a new book, yet new tragedies such as the Boston Marathon bombings, tornadoes, and school shootings were occurring almost weekly, the very situations my book addressed.  So I signed on for an Amazon-exclusive program to publish an e-book for 90 days before the hard copy book came out.  Leaning on my friends for email lists, I managed to sell about 3,000 copies.  On September 11 and Thanksgiving weekend I offered free downloads and 40,000 people downloaded the book!  The moral of the story, as many have learned: things can quickly go viral on the Internet but it’s a tough place to generate income.

Steve-Starr-1Trust me, I have no sour grapes.  My main motive in writing the book was to bring perspective and comfort to people going through hard times, and if 40,000 people got it free, all the better.  As I say, I have made a good living from writing and would probably keep doing it even if all my books were free.  I do worry, though, about new authors who don’t have a backlist to depend on.  As readers are trained to pay less (or nothing) for books, how can authors survive?

Last year Amazon sold more e-books than hard copy books, and some experts predict that by 2016 e-books will represent one-half of all books sold.  (E-book sales have recently cooled, however, and that prognostication now seems unlikely.)  Half of U.S. adults now own an e-reader or tablet computer, and there appears to be a generational divide.  According to the Financial Times, 52 percent of 8- to 16-year-olds prefer reading on screen, with just 32 percent preferring print.

Certainly, e-books offer significant advantages.  They are amazingly portable, for one thing.   Logos Bible Software offers a package of 2,500 books that fit comfortably on a laptop computer and are instantly available with a few clicks.  Someone kindly gave me a Kindle Paperwhite reader, and I find it ideal for reading books on a long trip without straining my arm or briefcase.

Reading Books Makes You BetterWe still don’t know the long-term effects of reading e-books vs. traditional hard copy books.  Some studies show that people read slower on dedicated e-readers, and those who use tablets or computers or iPhones have a different reading experience, being constantly distracted by text messages, emails, Facebook, and other interruptions.  Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains explores the changes in brain function that may result.  Hyperlinked, multi-tasking readers do not have the same “deep reading” experience, and are less likely to store what they read in long-term memory.

In short, we face a revolution in reading not unlike the one Gutenberg introduced almost 600 years ago.  Nowadays authors are coached on “building your brand” more than on improving their writing.  Publishers care more about website stats and Twitter followers than the quality of an author’s work.

Frankly, I’m glad I’m as old as I am.  It’s been fun living through publishing’s golden age.  I’ll happily stick with the “deep reading” experience.  Nothing gives me more satisfaction than browsing through the books in my office.  They’re my friends—marked up, dog-eared, highlighted, a kind of spiritual and intellectual journal—in a way that my Kindle reader will never be.

Philip Yancey

Click Here to subscribe to Philip Yancey's blog:

https://bit.ly/SubscribePhilipYancey


Discussion

  1. Meghan Avatar
    Meghan

    I’m so late to this discussion, but I have to comment, as I just finished having dinner with a friend of mine in publishing and a long discussion about this very issue. Her opinion? E-books are still a great financial deal for the publishers. So much less money is involved in getting the book to buyers- there’s no large initial outlay, or incremental cost for every unit purchased- they don’t need to guess about how many copies will sell and organize print runs around it. All that needs to be done is upload the digital proofs and see what happens. They can break even if they sell the book for much less.

    It’s mostly the authors that are hurting now. And that’s the problem, because writers have no effective union, no one to advocate for them, and a pretty poor bargaining position against a mammoth publishing company. Further exacerbating things, writing is one of a few isolated professions – acting maybe, playing on a professional sports team- where there are enough people who would write for free. It used to be that producing a book cost a huge amount of money- much like a movie or a sports team, constraining the number of professionals the industry can afford and forcing publishers to be very selective. But e-publishing’s changed that. They don’t lose money on publishing a book on a bare bones budget, so why not publish everyone and see what happens? Since people will do it for free, there’s less incentive to drive author compensation up, and that’s the margin that’s currently being squeezed. Publishers have more incentive to put very little money into editing or carefully scouting and developing talent. Marketing may or may not be justified- put that onus in the hands of the amateur who has 400 Facebook friends, doesn’t she?

    And suddenly writing a book is in danger of becoming very much like selling Cutco knives to your family, friends, and your friends’ family’s friends. If something does take off, well, isn’t that nice. The system is still set up to profit from the next J.K. Rowling. But if not? The publishers more than make their money back in publishing many more books of dubious quality for minimal expense.

    And again, just speculation (but I find it so interesting!) She thinks the future is for publishers to completely disappear. They’re not needed and they’re not effective. The rationale for having them absorb the initial risk and expense is gone now that there is much less of both. Writers- especially those whom people want to read- will simply begin publishing all on their own. Because 10% of a $25 book is the same thing as $2.50 of a $2.50 book you put out yourself. Meanwhile, editors and marketers will be a service offered ad hoc by different entities that authors may or may not employ.

    Anyway, who knows. Neither of us is much of a fortune teller. But there are certain things I love about everyone being able to publish a book that becomes instantly globally and cheaply available. It’d be nice if the unpalatable parts you discuss end up just being growing pains en route to giving authors much more control over their final product’s content and price, and their own income.

  2. Vicki Bee Avatar
    Vicki Bee

    I wish I would have been around when those free downloads were offered.
    My former husband and daughter’s dad was killed on September 11 in Tower 1. We watched it happen, along with the rest of the country I know, but the rest of the country seems to have forgotten how they felt as fast as they saw it happening; nothing else explains why two weeks after it occurred they told us we were “dwelling on negativity” to still be that distressed about it.
    Anyway, I had no idea what to do then beyond walking through life feeling shellshocked in a way I’ve never before or since experienced – I really haven’t made a terribly great amount of progress since then either. In fact, if I’d never found this place called the Grief Recovery Method, I honestly don’t believe I’d be writing this now because I don’t think I could have gone much beyond 10 years of being in that much emotional angst.
    The Grief Recovery Method is still the only place that has ever said we’re actually ALLOWED to feel anger at God. Nobody else seems to think He can handle it, not even my friend whose husband died on Flight 93 who said “You might not like what’s happened but you still have to trust God.” Which to be frank, I no longer even trust Him as well as being confused, angry and pained about everything.
    All of this would have been so much easier to deal with if my daughter hadn’t reacted so horribly to the news. The word devastated is inadequate to describe whatever it did to her and my writing skills are nowhere near a place that can accurately convey how completely it annihilated every part of the goodness of her character to get the news – especially from someone in her family, who had to be the one to TELL her we need to consider him dead although no scientific (physical) evidence has ever been found to prove he ever lived on this earth much less left it in such a disgusting way.
    I once saw a show in which the mother said “Words can’t describe what it’s like to see your child in pain, especially as much as she was feeling…” I never used to know what it meant until I had to look into my daughter’s face and tell her they were considering her dad dead, knowing before I even said it that the news would cause her to feel pain. Although if I’d known how MUCH pain, I think I would have opted for the coward’s way and asked someone else to tell her the news so she didn’t have to associate the worst news of her life as coming from my mouth so that to this day she still can hardly talk to me.

  3. Steve Mittelstaedt Avatar

    Having read Nicholas Carr’s book I disagree with his assessment as it applies to dedicated e-readers. Hyper-linking on the monochrome Kindles (an possibly the other devices) doesn’t keeping me from deep engagement with the text. Probably because it doesn’t work very well and is frankly quite slow. I’ve had Kindle e-readers for several years now and they’ve granted access to materials I wouldn’t have otherwise read. Amazon’s plans for the device never really materialized as this specific medium really isn’t conducive to the distractive advertising that seems to drive the economics of the internet.

    Tablets are another matter altogether. They play straight into the worst of what Carr describes.

    The challenge for ministry seems to be to figure out how to adapt to the change you describe.

Leave a Comment

Recent Blog Posts

Learning to Write

19 comments

Miracle on the River Kwai

38 comments

Word Play

14 comments

Who Cares?

37 comments

Lessons from an Owl

17 comments

A Political Tightrope

77 comments

63 thoughts on “Farewell to the Golden Age”

  1. I’m so late to this discussion, but I have to comment, as I just finished having dinner with a friend of mine in publishing and a long discussion about this very issue. Her opinion? E-books are still a great financial deal for the publishers. So much less money is involved in getting the book to buyers- there’s no large initial outlay, or incremental cost for every unit purchased- they don’t need to guess about how many copies will sell and organize print runs around it. All that needs to be done is upload the digital proofs and see what happens. They can break even if they sell the book for much less.

    It’s mostly the authors that are hurting now. And that’s the problem, because writers have no effective union, no one to advocate for them, and a pretty poor bargaining position against a mammoth publishing company. Further exacerbating things, writing is one of a few isolated professions – acting maybe, playing on a professional sports team- where there are enough people who would write for free. It used to be that producing a book cost a huge amount of money- much like a movie or a sports team, constraining the number of professionals the industry can afford and forcing publishers to be very selective. But e-publishing’s changed that. They don’t lose money on publishing a book on a bare bones budget, so why not publish everyone and see what happens? Since people will do it for free, there’s less incentive to drive author compensation up, and that’s the margin that’s currently being squeezed. Publishers have more incentive to put very little money into editing or carefully scouting and developing talent. Marketing may or may not be justified- put that onus in the hands of the amateur who has 400 Facebook friends, doesn’t she?

    And suddenly writing a book is in danger of becoming very much like selling Cutco knives to your family, friends, and your friends’ family’s friends. If something does take off, well, isn’t that nice. The system is still set up to profit from the next J.K. Rowling. But if not? The publishers more than make their money back in publishing many more books of dubious quality for minimal expense.

    And again, just speculation (but I find it so interesting!) She thinks the future is for publishers to completely disappear. They’re not needed and they’re not effective. The rationale for having them absorb the initial risk and expense is gone now that there is much less of both. Writers- especially those whom people want to read- will simply begin publishing all on their own. Because 10% of a $25 book is the same thing as $2.50 of a $2.50 book you put out yourself. Meanwhile, editors and marketers will be a service offered ad hoc by different entities that authors may or may not employ.

    Anyway, who knows. Neither of us is much of a fortune teller. But there are certain things I love about everyone being able to publish a book that becomes instantly globally and cheaply available. It’d be nice if the unpalatable parts you discuss end up just being growing pains en route to giving authors much more control over their final product’s content and price, and their own income.

    Reply
  2. I wish I would have been around when those free downloads were offered.
    My former husband and daughter’s dad was killed on September 11 in Tower 1. We watched it happen, along with the rest of the country I know, but the rest of the country seems to have forgotten how they felt as fast as they saw it happening; nothing else explains why two weeks after it occurred they told us we were “dwelling on negativity” to still be that distressed about it.
    Anyway, I had no idea what to do then beyond walking through life feeling shellshocked in a way I’ve never before or since experienced – I really haven’t made a terribly great amount of progress since then either. In fact, if I’d never found this place called the Grief Recovery Method, I honestly don’t believe I’d be writing this now because I don’t think I could have gone much beyond 10 years of being in that much emotional angst.
    The Grief Recovery Method is still the only place that has ever said we’re actually ALLOWED to feel anger at God. Nobody else seems to think He can handle it, not even my friend whose husband died on Flight 93 who said “You might not like what’s happened but you still have to trust God.” Which to be frank, I no longer even trust Him as well as being confused, angry and pained about everything.
    All of this would have been so much easier to deal with if my daughter hadn’t reacted so horribly to the news. The word devastated is inadequate to describe whatever it did to her and my writing skills are nowhere near a place that can accurately convey how completely it annihilated every part of the goodness of her character to get the news – especially from someone in her family, who had to be the one to TELL her we need to consider him dead although no scientific (physical) evidence has ever been found to prove he ever lived on this earth much less left it in such a disgusting way.
    I once saw a show in which the mother said “Words can’t describe what it’s like to see your child in pain, especially as much as she was feeling…” I never used to know what it meant until I had to look into my daughter’s face and tell her they were considering her dad dead, knowing before I even said it that the news would cause her to feel pain. Although if I’d known how MUCH pain, I think I would have opted for the coward’s way and asked someone else to tell her the news so she didn’t have to associate the worst news of her life as coming from my mouth so that to this day she still can hardly talk to me.

    Reply
  3. Having read Nicholas Carr’s book I disagree with his assessment as it applies to dedicated e-readers. Hyper-linking on the monochrome Kindles (an possibly the other devices) doesn’t keeping me from deep engagement with the text. Probably because it doesn’t work very well and is frankly quite slow. I’ve had Kindle e-readers for several years now and they’ve granted access to materials I wouldn’t have otherwise read. Amazon’s plans for the device never really materialized as this specific medium really isn’t conducive to the distractive advertising that seems to drive the economics of the internet.

    Tablets are another matter altogether. They play straight into the worst of what Carr describes.

    The challenge for ministry seems to be to figure out how to adapt to the change you describe.

    Reply

Leave a Comment