Someone sent me this delightful video just as I was reading a book that explores the word redeem. Slum children creating music out of garbage stands as a perfect metaphor for a word usually encountered in theology texts.
Some twenty years ago Jerry Sittser, a religion professor at Whitworth College, was involved in a horrific auto accident. A drunk driver hit the vehicle he was driving, killing Jerry’s mother, wife, and four-year-old daughter—three generations at once. Jerry survived, along with three other children who had significant injuries. Not long afterward he published the book A Grace Disguised giving his reflections on the tragedy and its effect on his faith.
Last year he published a follow-up book, A Grace Revealed, describing what has happened since, including a re-marriage and the challenges of a blended family. That book has a passage on “redemption,” for Jerry asks what good has come out of the difficult times he lived through.
Most English words that begin with the prefix re-, he notes, look backwards: we re-visit a thought, re-hab an old house, re-sume a school semester after the holidays. The word re-deem points ahead, to God’s promise to re-store creation to its original design. Sittser adds a further insight, that redemption always involves a cost. To redeem a slave, someone must pay—or, in the case of the U.S. civil war, an entire nation must pay. To redeem the world, Someone must die.
I would suggest one further aspect of redemption: though looking to the future, redemption does not erase the past. A ransomed slave still bears the scars and memories
of his time of bondage. Creation “groans as in the pains of childbirth,” the apostle Paul says of the redemption process of planet Earth. Jerry Sittser, the victims of war and persecution, the community of Newtown, Connecticut—they may find ways to endure suffering, even redeem it, but the painful memories will never disappear, nor should they. Even Jesus’ resurrected body retained scars.
Indeed, this notion of redeemed suffering may be the distinctive Christian contribution to the problem of suffering. Governments respond to suffering by attempting to remove it. The U.S. invades Iraq—oops, there’s Afghanistan! We help freedom fighters in Libya, but along come Egypt and Syria. Where does it stop? Medicine conquers smallpox and polio (almost), but what about malaria, AIDS, MRSA, and of course cancer? Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Newtown—can we ever stop these tragedies? No matter how well-intentioned and admirable, our attempts to remove suffering most often end up resembling the carnival game Whack-a-mole.
Each major religion has its own slant on the universal problem of suffering. Islam says we should submit and accept all that happens as God’s will. Doctors in Muslim countries tell me that parents rarely protest when their baby dies—grieve, yes, but not protest. Hinduism goes further, teaching that the suffering we bear is deserved, the result of sins we committed in a previous life. Buddhism frankly admits, “Life is suffering,” and teaches how to embrace it.
The Christian faith encourages protest, even to the extent of including the very words we can use in books like Job, Psalms, Lamentations, Jeremiah. We pray along with Jesus that God’s will “be done on earth as it is in heaven,” and vigorously oppose the evil and suffering that keeps the prayer from being answered.
Despite what some prosperity-gospel teachers claim, we have no promise that suffering will be removed, only that it will be redeemed—or, to use a more modern word, recycled. I take used and crushed aluminum cans to a redemption center in hopes that someone will make something useful out of them. I drop off an outdated computer knowing that someone will remove the gold and rare earths and “redeem” them in new and better ways.
The apostle Paul likened his worldly accomplishments to a pile of dung; yet even that can be recycled, as fertilizer. The sufferings of Martin Luther King Jr., of Nelson Mandela, of Gandhi, of Solzhenitsyn, were all redeemed in ways the persons themselves could not have imagined at the time. And the hallmark crime of history, the execution of God’s own Son, we remember as Good Friday, not Dark or Tragic Friday. Jesus said he could have called on legions of angels to prevent the crucifixion. He did not. The Christian way is not around pain, but through it.
In the movie Shadowlands, based on the life of C. S. Lewis, his wife Joy Davidman experiences a brief remission from her excruciating bout with cancer. The two have a romantic interlude in Greece, a moment of exquisite grace. Looking ahead to what awaits her once the cancer flares up again, Joy says, “The pain I’ll feel then is part of the happiness I feel now. That’s the deal.”

Joy dies. And in one of the final scenes C. S. Lewis tries to comfort her son David Gresham. Lewis clung to belief in Heaven as a drowning man clings to a life-preserver, or perhaps as a starving man dreams of food. He makes a subtle change in Joy’s words: “The pain I feel now is part of the happiness I’ll feel then. That’s the deal.”
Oh, yes, and while thinking such forward-looking lofty thoughts, don’t forget to watch the present-day, very down-to-earth video above…

I did have the opportunity to look into some of the work by Miroslav Volf, namely, his work: “The End of Memory.” While I could not find a direct view of the Sandy Hook incident you mention, I still found this mentioned work quite interesting. Huebner (2008) who wrote the discussion of the mentioned work by Volf, mentions that at a certain point Volf suggests that “instead of a generic . . . duty to remember . . . we should speak instead of ‘remembering truthfully.'” Further, “this reference to truthfulness is meant to capture both a desire for justice and a commitment to reconciliation.” However, the desire for justice seems to be eclipsed by the power of forgiveness wrought. As it is, Huebner mentions that (for Volf) “the forgiver has known the offense–and forgiveness presupposes knowledge of the offense as offense.” Thus, memory must be approached in a light that, in reality, forgets the negative nature of things past. This concept captured my attention in terms of both the nature of forgiveness and the nature of memory. I suppose what I wonder is if this type of forgetful (of the offensive nature of a memory) memory is only possible for the Christian mind? As Bonhoeffer (1995) stated, “complete truthfulness is only possible where sin has been uncovered, and forgiven by Jesus.” Thus, without a relationship with the One who instructs us as to how we should forgive (as God himself removes the offensive nature of our offenses), would this type of mentality even be feasible apart from God?
Thank you for your continued input Mr. Yancey! I truly appreciate intellectual prodding (that is, if it is even close to well-founded).
Soy de Paraguay (el lugar donde tiene lugar la historia del video) y sólo quiero mencionar que la perspectiva del artículo a partir del reciclaje y la redención fue brillante. Ver a mis compatriotas y a mi escritor preferido unidos en una historia me emocionó casi hasta las lágrimas. Le doy gracias a Dios por tu vida, Philip. Tus libros y tus preguntas son lo más inspirador y revelador que leí en mucho tiempo.
Dear Mr. Yancey,
reading the precious Word of God and reading your books helps me to grow in faith.
Helen Keller, who knew about suffering, said: “We could never learn to be brave and courageous, if there was only joy in our life.”
Thank you for sharing the “Landfillharmonic”.
Greetings and best regards from Austria.
Philip, I have most all your works and am deeply grateful for the gift you’ve been given and the honesty and vulnerability in which you explore topics. Your work has made a deep impact in my life and walk and I have bought many copies of What’s So Amazing for my friends.
I’m attaching a link of a video that best brings grace to life for me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EJt5T4pZSQ
I had the fortune of watching this musical in London called “Whistle Down The Wind” based on an old film starring Hayley Mills. The musical was written by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Jim Steinman (Meat Loaf writer). There is a small deep-south town waiting for a revival. An escaped criminal is wounded and hides out in a barn. When 3 kids find him they ask him who he is…he awakes, startled, and curses out “Jesus Christ”. The story goes from there as they kids protect and treat this hardened criminal with love that he’s never experienced while parents are out looking vigilantly to apprehend this criminal to “protect” their children (as I would). The song in the video still makes me cry as you see the effect of treating someone who doesn’t deserve it with grace while the world does what it thinks is natural in seeking justice.
Oh, in relation to my last post, I meant that “if my own prodding into my various analyses was even well-founded.” I only meant to question whether or not I, myself, was on a noteworthy track.
I just thought I should clarify, because the way I wrote that sounded like I was referring to your (Mr. Yancey’s) prodding. Which was not the case (as your insight I hold in high esteem)!
Okay, enough said.